<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:xrl="http://1060.org/xrl" version="2.0"><channel><title>1060 NetKernel</title><link>http://www.1060.org/blogxter/publish/2</link><description>A discussion of 1060 NetKernel and Resource Oriented Programming</description><language>en-us</language><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Video Talk: Architectural Implications of RESTful Design</title><link>http://www.1060.org/blogxter/entry?publicid=FFCF0B778BA8A2C17519031F64064F0B</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.1060.org/blogxter/entry?publicid=FFCF0B778BA8A2C17519031F64064F0B</guid><description>I gave a seminar at SkillsMatter last week title 'The
Architectural Implications of RESTful Design'. The video and slides
are available.


  


Download the slides here
...</description><generator>NetKernel Standard Edition v2.2 Blogxter v1.0.0</generator><pubDate>Tue,
				 13 May 2008 11:04:00
				 GMT
			</pubDate></item><item><title>Resource Identifiers, SuperStack and Context</title><link>http://www.1060.org/blogxter/entry?publicid=700DD941763DB1FCD9E329338E278ED9</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.1060.org/blogxter/entry?publicid=700DD941763DB1FCD9E329338E278ED9</guid><description>Good forum post by SteveOfAR asks about the nature of resource
identifiers and the resolution process through the NK adress space.
Led me to post another long answer with a lot of details and
fundamental thinking...

Superstack and
ROC"

Steve pointed out that there's now gathering interest in the
academic commonuity -

Its really great to have people starting to get to push on the
edges of the abstraction. As my forum post says - we've been
waiting quite a long time - 8 years since we starte...</description><generator>NetKernel Standard Edition v2.2 Blogxter v1.0.0</generator><pubDate>Wed,
				 07 May 2008 14:54:00
				 GMT
			</pubDate></item><item><title>InfoQ article: A RESTful ESB implemented using NetKernel</title><link>http://www.1060.org/blogxter/entry?publicid=DDC371225E415479CF80F8D3CADDEC4B</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.1060.org/blogxter/entry?publicid=DDC371225E415479CF80F8D3CADDEC4B</guid><description>Jeremy Deane has written a great article for InfoQ decsribing his architecture for a RESTful ESB built on NetKernel.http://www.infoq.com/articles/netkernel-casestudy...</description><generator>NetKernel Standard Edition v2.2 Blogxter v1.0.0</generator><pubDate>Wed,
				 09 Apr 2008 11:06:00
				 GMT
			</pubDate></item><item><title>Resource Oriented Addressing Granularity</title><link>http://www.1060.org/blogxter/entry?publicid=307A20869529E61D3D33F8B0458BDCBD</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.1060.org/blogxter/entry?publicid=307A20869529E61D3D33F8B0458BDCBD</guid><description>Following on the thread on the
forum - I just posted what turned
into a mini-essay on addressing and granularity in ROC....</description><generator>NetKernel Standard Edition v2.2 Blogxter v1.0.0</generator><pubDate>Fri,
				 04 Apr 2008 10:07:00
				 GMT
			</pubDate></item><item><title>NetKernel, HTTP and REST verbs</title><link>http://www.1060.org/blogxter/entry?publicid=3DBE3FCFD5E4BDF3621F2F674EFCA5FC</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.1060.org/blogxter/entry?publicid=3DBE3FCFD5E4BDF3621F2F674EFCA5FC</guid><description>
I just posted what turned out to be a small essay on the
forums in response to discussion about how NetKernel deals with
HTTP verbs. The summary is...

Q: Why isn't NetKernel mapping HTTP/REST verbs? A: Because its
RESTful.
...</description><generator>NetKernel Standard Edition v2.2 Blogxter v1.0.0</generator><pubDate>Thu,
				 03 Apr 2008 09:46:00
				 GMT
			</pubDate></item></channel></rss>